Any time I tell myself that things can't get much worse, they usually do.
Under the guise of removing red tape and streamlining procedures, Tony Blair wants to give himself sweeping powers without precedent in Britain since our constitutional monarchy was established.
The tiny four-page bill now working its way through parliament allows ministers to
- Abolish any law they don't like.
- Change any existing or new law they want to, in almost any way at all.
- Introduce new laws based on proposals by a Law Commission, with almost any changes they feel like.
These sweeping powers are not to be scrutinised or debated by parliament - there will just be a single chance for parliament to notice whatever is in the small print (while the Prime Minister intones "
minor procedural changes - nothing to see here") , and veto it - otherwise a set of completely unscrutinised changes, of a scope which is
impossible to predict, will suddenly be part of the laws of the United Kingdom.
The so-called safeguards are weak, and don't affect the central fundamental change to the constitution. The government have only to convince themselves that they are being balanced, and that they really need to change the rules this way, rather than through parliament. They can't raise new taxes this way, and there is a maximum sentence for any new crimes they invent. And they can only remove freedom where they think it is "reasonable". But that's about it, for safeguards. And most of these safeguards vanish if they are just "clarifying" existing law, or if a Law Commission thinks it might be a good idea!
There
are precedents, of course. Before the power of the Crown was curtailed by Parliament, the King could rule by decree. And Adolf Hitler had an
Enabling Act that allowed him to rule like a dictator. But in a modern democracy, to attempt to abolish parliamentary scrutiny is shocking.
No doubt Blair will offer minor concessions and further insignificant "safeguards". This is not enough. The problem is not the dearth of safeguards (though that in itself is horrific).
No - the problem here is the power to rewrite the laws of a democracy on demand.
Its official and innocuous title is the
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill, but it has been called the
Abolition of Parliament Bill (
see Hansard) - Quite simply, granting that much power to the current and all future governments could deliver a fatal wound to our democracy.
Speak out now, while there is time - tell your MP though
http://theyworkforyou.com/What sort of madness has seized the mind of Her Majesty's Prime Minister, Anthony Blair, that he even imagines this is a good idea?